The Royal Society

BlogsIn Verba

UK and China, comparing notes on science and policymaking

Posted by Rapela Zaman, Senior Policy Adviser on 7 March 2012

 

For a science policy nerd like me, meeting with international counterparts is like taking a holiday or meeting old friends in the pub at Christmas; there are many fresh things to explore but you can quickly get down to  business.

Friday’s small but perfectly-formed gathering in Beijing of about 50 experts to discuss the role of science in public policy-making was no exception. Continue reading “UK and China, comparing notes on science and policymaking”

Neuroscience, conflict and security: a dual use dilemma

Posted by Catherine Jefferson, Senior Policy Adviser on 8 February 2012

 The Royal Society has launched the final report of the Brain Waves series, which investigate developments in neuroscience and their implications for society and policy.  Brain Waves 3: Neuroscience, conflict and security examines the potential applications of neuroscience in a military and law enforcement context.  These applications can be divided into two main goals: performance enhancement, ie, improving the efficiency of one’s own forces, and performance degradation, ie, diminishing the performance of one’s enemy.

 

Performance Enhancement

The report examines a number of areas in which advances in neuroscience could optimise performance in a military context, from the recruitment and training of military personnel to improving cognitive and operational performance in the field.  For example, neuroimaging techniques have revealed that the human brain can process images, such as targets, much faster than the subject is consciously aware of.  A neurally interfaced weapons systems that records these neural markers could therefore potentially provide significant advantages over other system control methods in terms of speed and accuracy.  The report also examines the potential for neuroscience to provide improved avenues for rehabilitation and the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.

 

Performance Degradation

As in many fields of science, knowledge and technologies used for beneficial purposes can also be misused for harmful purposes.  Advances in neuropharmacology and drug delivery are making precise manipulation of the brain for therapeutic purposes increasingly feasible but these advances could also be exploited to create incapacitating chemical weapons.  Some states have already demonstrated an interest and willingness to use such weapons despite the entry into force of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).  One notable example is the deployment of an incapacitating chemical agent (believed to be a mixture of derivatives of the synthetic opiate fentanyl) by the Russian Special Forces during the Moscow theatre hostage crisis in October 2002.  While the siege was brought to an end, 129 of the hostages died following the use of the agent and many others suffered serious and long-term injury, emphasising the challenges of developing and deploying a ‘safe’ incapacitating weapon.

The CWC bans the development and use of all toxic chemicals as weapons, including those that cause temporary incapacitation, but includes an exemption for ‘law enforcement purposes including domestic riot control’, which is open to some ambiguity as to range of toxic chemicals permissible.  Due in part to this ambiguity, the international response following the Russian use of fentanyl derivatives in the Moscow theatre siege was muted.  Furthermore, the UK government position on incapacitating chemical weapons appears to have recently shifted.  A 1992 statement given to the UK parliament by the then Foreign Office Minister indicated that that the UK considered riot control agents to be the only toxic chemicals permissible for law enforcement purposes. However a more recent statement in August 2009 indicates a less restrictive interpretation of the CWC and suggests that the use of incapacitating chemical agents for law enforcement purposes would be in compliance with the CWC as long as they were in types and quantities consistent with that permitted purpose.

As Brain Waves 3: Neuroscience, conflict and security emphasises, it is not technically feasible to develop an absolutely safe incapacitating agent and delivery system because of inherent variables such as the size, health and age of the target population, secondary injury and the requirement for medical aftercare.  The UK government should therefore publish a statement on the reasons for its apparent shift in position on the interpretation of the CWC’s law enforcement provision and countries adhering to the CWC should address the definition and status of incapacitating chemical weapons under the CWC at the Review Conference in April 2013.

Revolutionary science

Posted by Sarah Mee, Policy Adviser on 26 January 2012

Credit: Monasosh on Flickr

This week marks the first anniversary of the popular uprising in Egypt that resulted in the overthrow of the then president, Hosni Mubarak. Yesterday, as new rounds of demonstrations were taking place in Egypt, I attended the launch of an Institute of Development Studies bulletin on The Pulse of Egypt’s Revolt, exploring how and why the uprisings began. At the event, participants discussed the degree of optimism that might be held over whether the changes that so many strived for will be achieved. Will basic needs be met and social justice be achieved? The protests in Egypt continue long after Mubarak’s removal, with the military regime now the target.

We are particularly interested in the prospects for science and innovation now that a new parliament has been established.  The many images we saw from Egypt at the time of the uprising included those of demonstrators protecting the Library of Alexandria from looters by forming a human chain around it. This particularly struck a chord with us as the Library is one of the partners in the Egyptian case study of the Atlas of Science and Innovation in the Islamic World project.  This multi-partner project aims to chart the prospects for science and innovation across the member countries of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, through a series of country case studies.

As part of the evidence gathering process for the Egyptian case study, a small workshop was held at the library with a group of early career researchers, at which they discussed their hopes and aspirations for the future of science in Egypt. The anniversary has certainly given Egyptian scientists an opportunity to reflect on changes, amid positive reports of increased funding for science. 

The Egypt case study of the Atlas project will be published later this year.

Martin Rees looks back to understand why ‘scientific citizens’ will be important in the future

Posted by Jessica Bland on 16 January 2012

In what might be described as the science policy Christmas lecture, former Royal Society President Lord Rees offered a tour de force of recurrent issues in science policy. Speaking at the Cambridge Centre for Science and Policy, Rees navigated issues from energy supply to food security, with a nod to the BSE and MMR  controversies, as well as the effects of global population dynamics. Via an extended discussion of the role of scientists in international climate change discussions, he reaches the conclusion that there is a “special obligation” on scientists to engage with public policy debates that lie close to their academic work.

What makes this speech worth reading in full is Rees’s careful explanation of what this obligation entails. Scientists provide Continue reading “Martin Rees looks back to understand why ‘scientific citizens’ will be important in the future”

Digital tools for the scientific endeavour – one response to the changing world of science

Posted by Jessica Bland on 5 January 2012

FROM CLAIRE COPE IN THE SCIENCE POLICY CENTRE

Scientists collect data; analyse it; try to make sense of it all; and publish their findings in a scientific journal. Right? Well yes, but it’s not always as simple as that.

The way in which science is conducted has changed dramatically over the past couple of decades. Many scientists now collect terabytes of data, which would be impossible to include in a printed scientific article. And so today, the printed article acts more as a summary of the underlying data.

As a hypothesis-driven process, scientific research does not always deliver the anticipated results. Hundreds of experiments, some that are more informative than others, may be necessary to uncover a new phenomenon in science. Some experiments are conducted to optimise experimental conditions – to uncover the appropriate conditions in which to carry out further experiments. Others show no effect Continue reading “Digital tools for the scientific endeavour – one response to the changing world of science”

Transparent Government, not Transparent Citizens: getting to grips with what is meant by anonymised data

Posted by Marie Rumsby on 9 December 2011

The Index on Censorship held a debate asking if transparency is bad for science on Tuesday evening. Two of the Royal Society’s ‘Science as a Public Enterprise’ working group were on the panel: Sir Mark Walport FRS and Baroness Onora O’Neill FRS. Onora mentioned a useful report by Kieron O’Hara for the Cabinet Office’s transparency team on transparency and privacy.  Martha Henriques from the Science Policy Centre takes us through the paper…

The prospect of opening up scientific data to a wider audience is likely to have a profound influence on the progress and economics of science. Medical and drug trials are areas where increased sharing and reuse of data could have an enormously beneficial impact, with the potential for research to be faster, more efficient, and less expensive. But these areas of research, among others, often involve personal or private data of the subjects involved in the trials. When data is personal, how is it best to balance privacy of the individual with transparency of the research as a whole?

Kieron O’Hara investigates the challenges of striking the right balance between the privacy Continue reading “Transparent Government, not Transparent Citizens: getting to grips with what is meant by anonymised data”

Discovery Reinvented? The Promise of European Open Science

Posted by Jessica Bland on 7 December 2011

Next Wednesday, the Policy Centre is holding an event in Brussels…

Chaired by Martin Porter, Managing Director, Edelman | The Centre

& Geoffrey Boulton FRS, University of Edinburgh

Wednesday, December 14, 2011 from 12.00 to 17.30, followed by a drinks reception

The Centre is hosting a discussion of the upcoming Royal Society study entitled ‘Science as a public enterprise: opening up scientific information’.

The study focuses on the exchange of information among scientists and other interested groups in an era of increasingly data-heavy science. Principles of replication and re-use, that have been fundamental to the progress of science, are at risk when abundant data is not managed properly.  The Royal Society is exploring what a more open science could do to return science to these principles. Continue reading “Discovery Reinvented? The Promise of European Open Science”

An African science base: what would it take for young researchers to return?

Posted by Jessica Bland on 10 November 2011

From Richard Kirby, Marine Institute Research Fellow, Marine Institute, University of Plymouth

A couple of weeks ago, I chaired an inspirational panel discussion at the Royal Society involving an audience of the leaders of most of the African science academies and a panel comprising 6 early career African scientists representing Ghana, Nigeria and Ethiopia.  The purpose of this discussion was to enable African scientists working currently in the UK to tell the academies which factors would encourage them to return to Africa to help build their continent’s science base.  The panellists were remarkably and refreshingly frank in their message to the academy leaders.  “We want to come back and we want to participate, but we need to believe there will be support for science”; in other words, there has to be a partnership between the young scientists and the academies. The overriding message, to which scientists in many places could probably relate, was a plea for improved funding for infrastructure and materials.  Although in Africa this could be as simple as a reliable electricity supply to maintain valuable specimens in freezers, or a clean water supply for experiments. Continue reading “An African science base: what would it take for young researchers to return?”

7 billion: can we count on it?

Posted by Marie Rumsby on 31 October 2011

FROM ROBERT STIFF IN THE SCIENCE POLICY CENTRE

On 31st October 2011 the world population is projected to reach a landmark 7 billion people, according to UN estimates. A great deal of debate has surrounded the importance of this figure and what it means for the planet and its many inhabitants. The Royal Society is conducting a study which will address this, entitled ‘People and the Planet’, to be published in early 2012.

One point of discussion is the exact date of 7 billion people. This latest UN projection uses a new and more complex method than ever before. Hania Zlotnik, Director of the UN Population Division, has described how 100,000 future fertility paths have been calculated for each country. From these, a central value was taken to generate the ‘medium variant’ projection. It is from this that the 31st October 2011 is inferred.

Critics have rightly pointed out the challenges of making such a prediction. Because censuses are infrequent and incomplete, it is impossible to determine a precise date; even Ms. Zlotnik herself has said that “an interval of a few months or even a year would be a reasonable range of uncertainty”.

So what is the significance of this special date and the number 7 billion? It is not the number that is important, but the trend that it signifies. Demographers have calculated Continue reading “7 billion: can we count on it?”

Research careers – opening the discussion

Posted by Marie Rumsby on

FROM LAURA DAWSON IN THE SCIENCE POLICY CENTRE

On Wednesday 26 October, the Royal Society’s President, Paul Nurse, and the Minister for Universities and Science, David Willetts, hosted a roundtable discussion on research careers. The aim of the meeting was to start a discussion on the issues that affect PhD candidates and postdoctoral researchers in making career choices, and developing their skills to either remain in research, or to take those skills into the wider workplace. The Royal Society asked some of the participants to offer a few thoughts on the discussion; respecting Chatham House rules, below Dame Athene Donald FRS and Dr Jenny Rohn give their take Continue reading “Research careers – opening the discussion”