One of the most important ideas that we have continually emphasised is that peer review is a fundamental part of scientific publishing, helping to validate research and maintain scientific quality. Reviewers play a vital role in improving research for the benefit of everyone and the Editors of Proceedings A are extremely grateful to the time they have dedicated to ensuring that the journal continues to be a trustworthy source of information.

We thank all the reviewers who contributed to the journal in 2016 and a full list can be found in an editorial published earlier this year. Here we would like to particularly highlight our top 20 reviewers of 2016:

Scott Aaronson (The University of Texas at Austin, USA)
• Thomas Adcock (University of Oxford, UK)
• Aurelien Babarit (École Centrale de Nantes, France)
• Martin Bojowald (The Pennsylvania State University, USA)
• Bair Budaev (The University of California, Berkeley, USA)
• Roger Bustamante (Universidad de Chile, Chile)
• Roger Grimshaw (Loughborough University, UK)
• Anurag Gupta (Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India)
• Mark Hoefer (University of Colorado, Boulder, USA)
• Rich Lehoucq (The Sandia National Laboratories, USA)
• Shaofan Li (The University of California, Berkeley, USA)
• Olimpia Lombardi (Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina)
• Paul Martin (Colorado School of Mines, USA)
• Agnes Maurel (ESPCI, France)
• Donald Nield (The University of Auckland, New Zealand)
• Giuseppe Saccomandi (University of Perugia, Italy)
• Takashi Sakajo (Kyoto University, Japan)
• Natalie Sheils (University of Minnesota, USA)
• David Steigmann (The University of California, Berkeley, USA)
• Dominic Vella (University of Oxford, UK)

Their input is very much appreciated, and we hope you and others are able to review for Proceedings A again in future.


Leave a Reply

  • (will not be published)